It is obvious that due to the ban imposed by the Government of India, the aforesaid application bearing the trade mark TikTok cannot be used in India. This would be irrelevant for determining the ...

DNA technology has fundamentally revolutionized the criminal justice system, transforming how forensic investigations are ...

Advancing justice through DNA technology requires adherence to strict quality assurance standards, including laboratory ...

The Court emphasized that "such ad-interim reliefs have their own legal implications" and referenced the Srikant Upadhyay & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Anr. (2024) case, which stressed caution in ...

Under Indian law, cross objections and cross appeals serve similar purposes but have distinct procedural characteristics. Here are the key distinctions: ...

In Indian criminal law, motive and intention are distinct concepts that serve different purposes in determining criminal liability. While often used interchangeably in casual conversation, they have ...

Once an eviction order is passed, the tenant loses their statutory protection and remains in possession only by virtue of the stay order, not by any right under the Rent Control Act. This legal ...

The Supreme Court has established specific considerations for granting anticipatory bail in SC & ST Atrocity cases following the 2018 amendment to Section 18 of the Act. Here are the key ...

Courts must apply a systematic analytical framework to determine whether decree components are independent and separable or joint and inseverable. This determination has significant implications for ...

Based on established legal precedent, an accused person summoned under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) cannot apply for discharge under Section 227 of CrPC.

In summary, while judicial confessions are strong, reliable evidence that can independently support conviction, extra-judicial confessions are weak evidence requiring careful scrutiny and ...

The court established a fundamental distinction that will govern future interpretation of state amendments. Justice Mathur definitively held that state legislative enactments under Article 246 of the ...