Delhi High Court held that levy of penalty under section 271 (1) (c) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the limb i.e.

Delhi High Court held that cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect merely because the taxpayer has not ...

Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Haryana Acrylic Manufacturing Co. Vs. CIT had held that when the reasons supplied to ...

Appeal preferred an appeal before CIT (A), however, with a delay of 208 days. Accordingly, CIT (A) dismissed the appeal and held that as appellant has not provided a plausible explanation for the ...

ITAT Delhi held that CPC wrongly processed return by considering due date as 5 th August instead of 31 st October. Accordingly, interest charged under section 234A of the Income Tax Act deleted and ...

Delhi High Court held that passing of order without considering the contention of the assessee that entity that is ...

Delhi High Court held that putting together a structure of plywood sheets cannot be construed as constructing a residential ...

Demand cannot be raised solely based on the oral statement of witness without any further evidence or corroboration ...

To address this, SEBI issued a consultation paper proposing an expanded, explicit list of UPSI events while acknowledging the ...

Mergers and acquisitions are powerful strategies that can transform businesses and drive growth in an increasingly competitive global market. As companies continue to seek ways to enhance their ...

ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act on protective basis not justified since assessee established genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness of entity from which ...

ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards entire cash deposits during demonetization period by passing ex-parte order due to non-compliance by assessee without examining on merits unjustified.